Asana مقابل Shortcut — أيهما الأفضل؟
اختر Asana إذا: الفرق المتوسطة التي تحتاج سير عمل منظّم للمشاريع بدون تعقيد تقني
اختر Shortcut إذا: فرق البرمجيات التي تجاوزت Trello لكن تجد Jira خانقاً — النقطة المثالية لـ 10-100 مهندس
رأينا: Asana for simplicity, Shortcut for power users.
| Asana | Shortcut | |
|---|---|---|
| الأسعار | Free for up to 10 users | Starter $10.99/user/mo | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo |
| المزايا | Timeline and Gantt views, Workflow automation, Custom fields and forms, Portfolio tracking, 200+ integrations | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams |
| الأنسب لـ | Mid-size teams that need structured project workflows without developer complexity | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers |
| سهولة التعلّم | متوسط | متوسط |
الفرق الحقيقي
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Asana stands out with Workflow automation and Custom fields and forms. Shortcut counters with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations.
Asana's Achilles heel: free plan is barebones — you hit paywall fast on reporting and automation. Shortcut's: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
الخلاصة
If you value workflow automation and الفرق المتوسطة التي تحتاج, go with Asana. If فرق البرمجيات التي تجاوزت matters more, Shortcut is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.